ေဂါတမ ဗုဒၶဟာ ဗုဒၶဘာသာလို႔ လူသိမ်ားလာတဲ့ ဘာသာယံုၾကည္ကိုးကြယ္မႈကို တည္ေထာင္ခဲ့သူ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ထူး ပုဂၢိဳလ္ျမတ္ႀကီးျဖစ္တယ္။ "ဗုဒၶ" ဆိုတဲ့အမည္က အရိယာသစၥာသိၿပီး သဗၺညဳဥာဏ္ေတာ္ကိုရၿပီး ဘုရားျဖစ္မွ ေခၚၾကတာ။ ဗုဒၶရဲ႕ အဓိပၸါယ္က ႏုိးထျခင္း၊ အလံုးစံုကို သိျမင္ေတာ္မူေသာ သဗၺညဳ ျမတ္စြာဘုရား ဆိုတဲ့ အဓိပၸါယ္ပါ။ လူ႔သမိုင္းတေလွ်ာက္ တိရစၦာန္ေတြကို သတ္ျဖတ္ၿပီး ယဇ္ပူေဇာ္ျခင္းကို ဆန္႔က်င္တဲ့ အဆံုးအမေတြကို ေဟာၾကားေတာ္မူတဲ့ ဘာသာေရးေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြထဲမွာ ျမတ္ဗုဒၶက ပထမဆံုးပါ။ ဗုဒၶျမတ္စြာဟာ မဟာလူသားတစ္ပါးပါ။ သူ႔ရဲ႕သက္တမ္းေတာ္တစ္ေလွ်ာက္လံုးမွာ လူသားေတြအေပၚ ထူးထူးျခားျခား ဘုန္းတန္ခိုး ၾသဇာႀကီးမားစြာ လႊမ္းမိုးခဲ့တယ္။ မရပ္မနား လႈပ္ရွားသြားလာၿပီး တရားဓမၼေတြကို သင္ၾကားေပးခဲ့တဲ့ အာစရိယ ဆရာဘ၀တစ္ေလွ်ာက္လံုးမွာ ဗုဒၶကိုယ္ေတာ္ျမတ္ႀကီးဟာ သူ႔တရားကို နာယူသူ လူေပါင္းမ်ားစြာကို မဂ္ဥာဏ္ဖိုလ္ဥာဏ္ကို ရရွိေစခဲ့တယ္။
ဒီလို ျမင့္ျမတ္တဲ့ အထြဋ္အျမတ္ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ရဲ႕အမည္ကို လူေတြ ေသာက္စားမူးယစ္ရာ ေပ်ာ္ပါးၾကရာ ဘားခန္းတစ္ခုရဲ႕နာမည္အျဖစ္ သံုးတာဟာ ဗုဒၶျမတ္စြာကို ကိုးကြယ္စည္းကပ္သူ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ၀င္ေတြကို ေစာ္ကားျခင္းပါပဲ။ ဒါေပမယ့္ ဘယ္သူမွ တားဆီးျခင္း၊ ကန္႔ကြက္ျခင္း မရွိဘဲ လြတ္လြတ္လပ္လပ္ လုပ္ကိုင္ေနလိုက္တာမ်ား ဆိုင္ခြဲေပါင္းကို မနည္းဘူးဗ်ာ။ ၂၀၀၄ ခုႏွစ္ကတည္းက စလာလိုက္တာ အခုဆို ဆိုင္ခြဲေပါင္း ရွိေနၿပီေလ။ ဟိုႏိုလူလူမွာရွိတဲ့ ဘားတစ္ခုပဲ ပိတ္သိမ္းေအာင္ လက္မွတ္ထိုး ကန္႔ကြက္ႏိုင္ခဲ့တယ္။
ဒီလို ကိစၥမ်ဳိးက်ေတာ့ ဗုဒၶဘာသာကို တန္ဖိုးထားပါတယ္ဆိုတဲ့လူေတြ ဘယ္မ်ားေရာက္ေနပါလိမ့္။ ဟိုတေလာက သံဃာေတာ္ေတြ ေသြးေျမက်ပါၿပီ၊ ဗုဒၶဘာသာကို ထိပါးေနပါတယ္နဲ႔ ေအာ္ခဲ့ၾကတဲ့လူေတြ ဒီ ဗုဒၶဘားေတြ ဖြင့္ခဲ့တုန္းကေတာ့ ဘယ္နားမွာ သြားအိပ္ေနၾကပါလိမ့္။ မခံခ်င္လြန္းလို႔ ေရးေနတာပါ။ တကယ္တမ္း ေစာ္ကားေနတာက်ေတာ့ ၿငိမ္ခံေနၾကတယ္။ အင္အားႀကီးႏိုင္ငံေတြကိုေတာင္ သြားၿပီး lobby လုပ္ႏိုင္တဲ့ အစြမ္းေတြ ရွိေနၾကတာပဲဗ်ာ။ ဒီလူေတြ ဒါမ်ဳိးက်ေတာ့ lobby လုပ္ဖို႔ မစဥ္းစားမိဘူးလား။ ကြၽန္ေတာ္ ႏိုင္ငံေရးသမား မဟုတ္ပါဘူး။ လက္ရွိအစိုးရဘက္လိုက္ၿပီး ဆန္႔က်င္ဘက္အုပ္စုကို က်ိန္ဆဲေနတာလဲမဟုတ္ဘူး။ ႏိုင္ငံေရးနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္လာေတာ့မွာ ဘာသာေရးတို႔၊ သာသနာေရးတို႔ ထေအာ္ေနတဲ့ ႏိုင္ငံေရးသမားဆိုတဲ့ လူထူးလူဆန္းႀကီးေတြကို ျမင္ျပင္းကပ္လြန္းလို႔ ေျပာေနတာပါ။
အေတြးအျမင္မ်ား http://thoughtsnvisions.blogspot.com/ မွ ရယူ ေဖာ္ျပထားပါသည္။
2 comments:
DEMOCRACY may be a word familiar to most, but it is a concept still misunderstood and misused in a time when totalitarian regimes and military dictatorships alike have attempted to claim popular support by pinning democratic labels upon themselves. Yet the power of the democratic idea has also evoked some of history's most profound and moving expressions of human will and intellect: from Pericles in ancient Athens to Vaclav Havel in the modern Czech Republic, from Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence in 1776 to Andrei Sakharov's last speeches in 1989.
In the dictionary definition, democracy "is government by the people in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.
" In the phrase of GENERAL AUNG SAN, democracy is a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people."
FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY are often used interchangeably, but the two are not synonymous. Democracy is indeed a set of ideas and principles about freedom, but it also consists of a set of practices and procedures that have been molded through a long, often tortuous history. In short, democracy is the institutionalization of freedom. For this reason, it is possible to identify the time-tested fundamentals of constitutional government, human rights, and equality before the law that any society must possess to be properly called democratic.
Democracies fall into two basic categories, direct and representative. In a direct democracy, all citizens, without the intermediary of elected or appointed officials, can participate in making public decisions. Such a system is clearly only practical with relatively small numbers of people--in a community organization or tribal council, for example, or the local unit of a labor union, where members can meet in a single room to discuss issues and arrive at decisions by consensus or majority vote. Ancient Athens, the world's first democracy, managed to practice direct democracy with an assembly that may have numbered as many as 5,000 to 6,000 persons--perhaps the maximum number that can physically gather in one place and practice direct democracy.Today, the most common form of democracy, whether for a town of 50,000 or nations of 52 million, is representative democracy, in which citizens elect officials to make political decisions, formulate laws, and administer programs for the public good. In the name of the people, such officials can deliberate on complex public issues in a thoughtful and systematic manner that requires an investment of time and energy that is often impractical for the vast majority of private citizens.
\Majority Rule and Minority Rights/
All democracies are systems in which citizens freely make political decisions by majority rule. But rule by the majority is not necessarily democratic: No one, for example, would call a system fair or just that permitted 51 percent of the population to oppress the remaining 49 percent in the name of the majority. In a democratic society, majority rule must be coupled with guarantees of individual human rights that, in turn, serve to protect the rights of minorities--whether ethnic, religious, or political, or simply the losers in the debate over a piece of controversial legislation. The rights of minorities do not depend upon the goodwill of the majority and cannot be eliminated by majority vote. The rights of minorities are protected because democratic laws and institutions protect the rights of all citizens.
ဗုုဓၵဘုုရားေၾကာ္ျငာျပီးသားျဖစ္တာေပါ့
အဂၤလန္မွာဆိုု ဘုုရားေက်ာင္းေတြ ႏိုုက္ကလပ္ျဖစ္ကုုန္ျပီ
ဒိုု ့ကိုုယ္ေတာ္ကမွေနရာရေသးတယ္။
Post a Comment